There is a level of sympathy with the position that Kevin Rudd finds himself in. We certainly live in a complex world where, in some radical circles, an off-color joke or a caricature that is designated as blasphemous can bring immediate sentence of death. This may appear to be half a world away from dealing with the Exclusive Brethren, but Kevin Rudd must consider all religions in his portfolio.
The only politically-safe way across the razor blades of religious bias is to somehow view the world through secular eyes – and yet maintain a stance that is broadly acceptable. Is this possible for Kevin Rudd?
Continue reading »
Jack the Insider has some straight-talking insights. We quote his article in the Australian Opinion section in full.
Quiet is the new loud
Jack the Insider Blog
The Australian
May 19, 2008Kevin Rudd is becoming adept at the political art of the back pedal. At this rate, it won’t be long before he hops on a unicycle and starts juggling chainsaws.
In August last year, Rudd called on four separate government agencies, including the Australian Federal Police, to investigate the activities of the Exclusive Brethren. Rudd described the kooky cult as “extremist” and in the business of “breaking up families.”
Continue reading »
Good reasoned debate is always a pleasure in the often chaotic world of politics. We came across such an opportunity today with a thoughtful submission by OZFreethinker – Why Rudd should let the Brethren slide.
When OzFreeThinker first read of the way the Letter to Kevin Rudd was treated, he states:
Now, on first thought, I was outraged but thinking a little more I offer the contention that Rudd got it right. While Australia does not have a constitution that explicitly states the church and state must be separated, going after the Brethren with governmental powers could be seen as an attack on religious freedom. And this is the correct view. The Brethren, no matter how despicable of a cult they are, should have their religious freedom. Rudd, by asking for any wrong doing by the Brethren to be directed to the police or other authorities, has made the right decision.
And then he added:
It seems that if there are instances of electoral and financial improprieties on behalf of the Brethren then they should be dealt with by the proper authorities. The federal government’s role should not be to show favour to the Brethren by allowing them access to the corridors of power nor target them as part of a (though understandable to be honest) campaign against them.
Here we must add our voice.
Continue reading »
Concerns regarding the ability of Kevin Rudd to ‘walk the walk’ following his undoubted ability to ‘talk the talk’ increased earlier today as the news broke of his rejection of a letter written to him by members of this site. The letter was sent based on Rudd’s oft repeated and clearly-defined statement regarding the Exclusive Brethren a few months ago when he called them an “extremist sect and cult”. Kevin Rudd then went on to say that he “believed they break up families”.
That is all we needed to hear. It is all that we have been saying for years. So the community of ex-Exclusive Brethren wrote to him.
Here is the Submission and the covering letter by Australian Peter Flinn:
25th February 2008
The Hon. Kevin Rudd MP
Prime Minister
Parliament House
CANBERRA ACT 2600Dear Prime Minister,
Exclusive Brethren
I am writing on behalf of a group of ex-members of the religious sect known as the Exclusive Brethren, and many others concerned about their activities. Our ages range from 30 to 80 years, and many of us have suffered traumatic experiences as a result of the doctrines and practices of this sect, whether having “escaped” recently or as long ago as 50 years.
Continue reading »
In a possible Quote of the Week, David Tchappat is quoted by the Sydney Morning Herald as stating “Living with the Exclusive Brethren is like living in the Big Brother house…”.
Um … probably not David. Although, we do admit there are some possible similarities.
If you remove the fact that you are living, eating and under the same roof with people who are distinctly not EB material – and add to this the fact that this is a manufactured environment for Television (a pipeline of filth) – and of course, sadly, you are a ‘Person under Discipline’ and this means that you are denied a number of things: including eternal salvation, ability to speak freely with members of your family still inside, and darnit, you’re going to miss the Rapture …
No – we concur that you are there because of money, that you are there because you’re ‘different’ and you’re there because you miss not having a family around you – a circular observation perhaps.
Continue reading »
May 16th, 2008
It is a unique experience. A young thirty-something fireman called David is participating in Australian TV’s ‘Big Brother’. Described as a cult-survivor, David has walked a road that not many people have known. In leaving the Exclusive Brethren, David left the first 19 years of his life completely behind him. It is gone. And as many of us know, it is a deeply damaging experience.
A cult survivor called David.
You see David looks like your average well-muscled fireman. But at the age of 32 he’s only been living in the real world for 13 years. He had to start from scratch after escaping an extreme religious sect at 19. Before then he’d never seen a movie, kissed a girl, listened to the radio or eaten at a restaurant. The group was called the Exclusive Brethren and they have some kooky folks. They live apart from the rest of us in their own isolated communities. And get this: they don’t vote in elections because it interferes with God’s right to ordain who rules – but they do fund the Liberal Party. You tell me the logic there and I’ll buy you lunch. Speaking of lunch – Exclusive Brethren can’t even share a meal with people outside their sect. David will never be able to break bread with his family ever again. And there are 15,000 in Australia. Bet you didn’t know about these guys… but you know Big Brother is boring.
Cults, racism and man-children: Big Brother’s far from bland
Perhaps the Exclusive Brethren are finding their true role in the scheme of things? The journey from oddity to cause célèbre is sometimes far shorter than anticipated. Admittedly the Exclusive Brethren are different. By erecting their high-fenced and steel-gated compounds, they are highlighting their belief that they are ‘not of us’. But if you suggest that by locking their doors and refusing casual visitors to their ‘meeting rooms’ they should not receive tax-exemption as a ‘public place of worship’, they will immediately cry ‘foul!’.
In their dealings with Governments they present themselves as unique arbiters of Christianity, deep-thinking and sober members of a cloistered group who are ‘not of this world’. Most politicians have traditionally been scared of the ‘religious discrimination’ accusation that would follow a refusal to meet such representatives. However, one of the side-effects of such self-labeling is that the spotlight of Truth can sometimes publicly showcase hypocrisy – and a publicly uncovered Hypocrite is a particularly uncomfortable position to be found in.
For all its faults, the democratic west has an instinctive moral knowledge of some issues, particularly those that deal with children and families. The arrogance of the Exclusive Brethren extends to splitting families apart over doctrinal differences and then in negatively influencing the children who remain against the normally departed father. The harshness and indifference that the EB display in such situations is breathtaking.
When you finally realize that the Exclusive Brethren do not actively recruit new members and that their international growth is entirely from within, their concentration upon the creation of new Exclusive school campuses takes on a new and sinister significance. By carefully controlling the education of their young and then refusing them the opportunity to go to universities, the Exclusive Brethren are indoctrinating a new generation and preventing their individual growth – and it is you, the tax-payer, who is assisting this process!
It is a sad indictment of a religious movement that spontaneously arose in early 19th century Europe. The Taylorite-Hales Exclusive Brethren could not be further from the original simplicity sought by the their Plymouth Brethren forefathers. The moment the doors first slammed shut against ‘outsiders’ in the late 1840′s, a form of spiritual xenophobia started to take root. We are today watching a cult that judges its success in materialist terms rather than by the souls it saves. Perhaps society should be grateful they do not wish us to join their ‘business’, but those who have family members physically and psychologically trapped behind their barred gates must continue to ensure they are not forgotten.
May 7th, 2008
It is excellent that the NZ and Australian press is monitoring the continued emphasis of the Exclusive Brethren in developing new school facilities. In Australia, with an eye upon generous government provisions for private schools, the Exclusive Brethren continue to push for reasons to increase, or at least maintain, an already huge $50 Million hand-out.
See:
- Peebs.Net News Desk
- No reason to fear church plan says sect
- Sect’s plans cause a stir
- New Brethren School Okayed
- Brethren plan refused
Why Kevin Rudd, the new Prime Minister of Australia, continues to fund a group that he personally described as “an extremist sect and cult” is unknown. What is known however, is that no other educational system offers so little to the future of its students as that of the Exclusive Brethren – who ban university education and eject their graduates into Brethren businesses at age 18 or into marriages as full-time mothers.
It appears that governments continue to assist the creation of a new generation of Exclusive Brethren whose introverted and damaged doctrines cause worldwide emotional hardship, pain and suffering for those who have attempted to reach out beyond the security fences and self-centered beliefs. We must hope that governments and local authorities will soon begin to realize the impact of their decisions in the lives and emotional well-being of young people who continue to be educated ‘behind bars’.
Once tax-payers understand the true purpose of Exclusive Brethren schools and the amount of money claimed in the process, we forsee a growing international outcry. Already many municipalities are investigating why the locked and barricaded fortress-like Exclusive Brethren Meeting Rooms should be allowed tax-exemption as ‘public places of worship’ while actively discouraging public access to visitors. For further information see Municipality Campaign on this site.








