August 27, 2008
What part of Senator Milne’s comments in Australian Parliament yesterday did the Exclusive Brethren not understand? Leaving aside the issue of the Hales-endorsed political smear campaigns, the false names and addresses on the various smear advertisements, the world-wide orchestrated political contributions, the sudden payments into tyre companies that then paid for the printing and/or advertising …
We could even leave aside the trail of broken families, the suicides and wrecked lives that are directly attributable to the Exclusive Brethren.
Senator Milne outlined some basic arithmetic for the Australian people.
It should be looked at by every tax-paying Australian.
Continue reading »
August 27th, 2008
COMMITTEES
Community Affairs Committee Reference Debate
resumed from 26 August, on motion by Senator Bob Brown:
That the following matters be referred to the Community Affairs Committee for inquiry and report by 26 November 2008:
(a) exemptions for the Exclusive Brethren and its members from Australian laws or administrative decisions;
(b) public funding, tax or other arrangements which do or may advantage the Exclusive Brethren over other community organisations;
(c) the activities of the Exclusive Brethren or its members which threaten or harm families, in particular, the best interests of children;
(d) the covert, as against overt, activities of the Exclusive Brethren or its members in the political process in Australia; and (e) any related matters.
Senator MILNE (Tasmania) (6.14 pm)
—I rise in continuance of the debate on Senator Brown’s motion. Last night, in beginning my remarks, I was commenting on the fact that when I was teaching on the northwest coast of Tasmania many years ago I had a very bright and capable young woman in my class who was not allowed to go on to further education because the Exclusive Brethren prohibited it. They prohibit their young people from being able to go to university at all. As a former Meadowbank school principal, David Stewart, an Exclusive Brethren principal said:
We do not go in for higher learning. We gave up universities in the 1960s as the hotbed of atheism. They prove that everything is nothing to their own satisfaction. We have suffered no loss to our knowledge. We particularly recoil from novels and cinemas.
Continue reading »
August 26, 2008
From Australian Hansard for proceedings Tuesday, August 26th, 2008
COMMITTEES
Community Affairs Committee Reference
Senator BOB BROWN (Tasmania—Leader of the Australian Greens) (5.47 pm) —
I move:
That the following matters be referred to the Community Affairs Committee for inquiry and report by 26 November 2008:
(a) exemptions for the Exclusive Brethren and its members from Australian laws or administrative decisions;
(b) public funding, tax or other arrangements which do or may advantage the Exclusive Brethren over other community organisations;
(c) the activities of the Exclusive Brethren or its members which threaten or harm families, in particular, the best interests of children;
(d) the covert, as against overt, activities of the Exclusive Brethren or its members in the political process in Australia; and (e) any related matters.
There has been a great deal of public disquiet about the Exclusive Brethren sect, which now Prime Minister Rudd as shadow foreign affairs minister commented upon back in September 2006 when he called for a review of federal funding of Exclusive Brethren schools.
Continue reading »







Is Australia a ‘breeding ground’ for cults?
Question:
What do the ‘Brisbane Christian Fellowship’ and ‘The Exclusive Brethren Christian Fellowship’ have in common?
Possible Answers:
1 – They both have ‘Christian Fellowship’ in their preferred title?
2 – They both break up families?
3 – Their leaders both live in Australia?
4 – There are reports of sexual abuse in both organizations?
5 – Both are accused of spiritual and emotional abuse?
6 – Both are sparking demands for a full government level investigation?
7 – Investigative reporters have just published compelling books on both?
8 – They give Christianity a bad name?
9 – All of the above?
Continue reading »