<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Was Kevin Rudd right to avoid investigating the Exclusive Brethren?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://peebs.net/exclusive-brethren-news/was-kevin-rudd-right-to-avoid-investigating-the-exclusive-brethren/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://peebs.net/exclusive-brethren-news/was-kevin-rudd-right-to-avoid-investigating-the-exclusive-brethren/</link>
	<description>The Exclusive Brethren Information Blog by Peebs.Net</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:54:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: John   Kennard</title>
		<link>http://peebs.net/exclusive-brethren-news/was-kevin-rudd-right-to-avoid-investigating-the-exclusive-brethren/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>John   Kennard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 00:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://peebs.net/blog/?p=43#comment-79</guid>
		<description>I  fully  agree  with  Kevin  Rudd&#039;s  decision  not  to  investigate  the  Brethren.  Once  you lift  the  lid  on  one  religious  group, you  are  then  morally  obliged  to  do  the  same  for  all  religious groups, thus  creating  a  administrative  and  legal minefield.
Whilst  there  is  much  about  the  Exclusive  Brethren  that  is  reprehensible  and  self  serving,  the  same  may  be  said  about  nearly  all  religious  organisations.
The  sooner  Christianity  is  seperated  from  organised  religion, the  better,  as  in  practice  most  religion,  is  rarely  Christian. 
 I  know  of  many people that  have  completely  given  up  on  Christianity,   after  the  way  they  were  treated by  a  Church, or  induviduals  from a  Church, and  these  churches  including  the exclusive  Brethren, have  a  lot  to answer  for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I  fully  agree  with  Kevin  Rudd&#8217;s  decision  not  to  investigate  the  Brethren.  Once  you lift  the  lid  on  one  religious  group, you  are  then  morally  obliged  to  do  the  same  for  all  religious groups, thus  creating  a  administrative  and  legal minefield.<br />
Whilst  there  is  much  about  the  Exclusive  Brethren  that  is  reprehensible  and  self  serving,  the  same  may  be  said  about  nearly  all  religious  organisations.<br />
The  sooner  Christianity  is  seperated  from  organised  religion, the  better,  as  in  practice  most  religion,  is  rarely  Christian.<br />
 I  know  of  many people that  have  completely  given  up  on  Christianity,   after  the  way  they  were  treated by  a  Church, or  induviduals  from a  Church, and  these  churches  including  the exclusive  Brethren, have  a  lot  to answer  for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

